Since the beginning of the month, the Times of London has left to offer all their content for free and has made its payment website. The reason, obviously, is that by not charging for news, sales revenues were substantially reduced, such as newspapers across the world. People who previously bought it, seeing that he could save over 400 pounds a year to read the same thing online, but said yes brothers and cousins \u200b\u200bhave a cost advantage for less. At the same time, by selling less, advertisers pay less because fewer people see their claims in these pages, or directly go to advertise, preferring to do elsewhere. In the online version of the newspaper, for example. In fact, advertisers of the website have been what has allowed for all these years, newspapers around the world to decide to give away the work product of hundreds of people each day. But now it's over. Not so is earning enough, especially if you want to make a newspaper not limited to regurgitate news agency basis or to cite what they say the public media as the BBC. So he wants to return to business as usual: who wants to read what has happened, to pay for it, that's what you live write, print, distribute, sell and hang in the network.
The matter is being followed with considerable interest worldwide, as all the other newspapers are considering whether to do the same thing or not. The New York Times has said it will make you check out soon. Some people think that people just happen to another place where you can read for free news, and if that starts to make another, and so on until perhaps the only thing left whatever it puts its Web mail, for example. Or Wikipedia, which also has daily news section. Others believe that readers will realize that quality costs and there will be a sufficient number of paganinis for the pay site is viable, and even continue to attract advertisers. The Financial Times, for example, has for years been of payment and do well, but obviously have a very specific type of clientele who can afford the expense, and who also read updates every 24 hours is taking too long. If a market sneeze at three in the morning and you do not you find out until two days later will be too late.
The theme also extends to everything that can be get on the Internet, mostly illegally. Through loss (correct: "stop win", which is not the same) billion, the music industry, film and printing has been forced to ginger up and look for ways to charge less for their products exchange for reducing production costs and transportation. Allow to download a song directly to your computer generates a lot less expense than having to record it on tape or disk media to transport those places where they can purchase and pay for all those involved in the process, and that should be reflected in the price. Okay, do not charge 20 euros for a yield. But I can not let people take it all for free. So in exchange for seeking a flexible, cheaper and / or advertising added, I'll see if I convinced that if you enjoy all of this is just something you have to pay for it, that you either like aa no charge for your gigs. And that is basically the thing. Fingers crossed that people willingly accept a little charity release. Let's see what happens.
-
For if anyone half interested, the Times paywall means that I am no longer a reporter futbolero boring. The football blog has become for payment also, and it is only for professional writers. During the World Cup, all God was writing about the same, so the stuff was pretty saturated, and also because of the success English football, and appear to have signed to a professional first division, Guillem Balague, for long on the football homeland. So I do not think I posted anything else, so what has happened. Total paid either, lol.
0 comments:
Post a Comment